On Oct. 19, the Justice Department notified Mayor Muriel Bowser that it is investigating whether the D.C. Department of Corrections has a pattern or practice of violating the constitutional rights of the people it holds. In plain English, that means a systemic problem, not a one-off. The letter was copied to the corrections director, the warden and the city’s attorney general, and it covers conditions back to Jan. 1, 2021.
The Justice Department listed four areas: failing to protect people from excessive force, inadequate medical care, unsafe and unsanitary conditions, and inadequate nutrition. In the letter, it pointed to a report from the D.C. auditor.
That’s the twist. The federal government is now looking into conditions that the city’s own watchdog wrote up more than a year ago.
What a federal civil rights investigation means
The law behind this is the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, or CRIPA. It lets the U.S. attorney general sue a state or local government over a pattern of rights violations in places like jails, and ask a court for “minimum corrective measures.” Before suing, the Justice Department has to give written notice at least 49 days ahead.
The Justice Department says it has not reached any conclusions, and that where it has found CRIPA violations elsewhere, the resulting settlement agreements have led to reforms. In her letter, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon wrote that if the Justice Department finds systemic violations, “we will inform you of our findings.” Allegations, in other words, aren’t findings.
“The Constitution protects the rights of every incarcerated American, including those held in custody in our nation’s capital,” Dhillon said.
Who runs the jail
The D.C. Jail is a city operation, run by the Department of Corrections. It holds people awaiting trial, people serving misdemeanor sentences and people convicted of felonies who are waiting to be transferred to the federal Bureau of Prisons. That last part matters: under the 1997 Revitalization Act, D.C. residents sentenced to a year or more go to the Bureau of Prisons. A city jail with federal roommates. Welcome to D.C.
The jail has two facilities. The Central Detention Facility, or CDF, opened in 1976; the Correctional Treatment Facility opened in 1992. On the D.C. Council, the city’s legislature, the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, chaired by Ward 2 Council member Brooke Pinto, oversees the Department of Corrections. The Corrections Information Council, an independent monitor, inspects and reports on conditions.
The feds have been here before. In 2021, after an unannounced inspection, the U.S. Marshals Service moved about 400 detainees in federal custody out of the Central Detention Facility. Earlier that fall, a federal judge held the Department of Corrections’ then-director and warden in contempt in the case of a Jan. 6 defendant and asked the Justice Department to look into it. Just the News reports that as many as 50 people convicted over the Jan. 6 riot were held in D.C. jails.
What the auditor found
The auditor’s report came out May 28, 2025, and covered July 2023 through June 2024. It found 10 people died in custody in that year, a death rate more than three and a half times the national average for jails, and an overdose rate about 10 times the national average. A summary by the Council for Court Excellence, a civic group, lists at least 790 assaults and more than 1,595 emergency maintenance problems. Staff used naloxone, the overdose-reversal drug, at least 148 times.
Let’s remember our Stats 101. A rate built on 10 deaths is like a batting average after a handful of at-bats: one more or one fewer swings it a lot, so “three and a half times” deserves a careful read. And a count of reported assaults counts what got reported. None of that makes the numbers wrong. It makes them a starting point.
The Department of Corrections pushed back. It said the report wasn’t “a fair, unbiased, and accurate assessment” of conditions and pointed to its national accreditations and a passed federal audit under the Prison Rape Elimination Act. Same rule for that side: a passed outside audit and the auditor’s numbers aren’t mutually exclusive. Both can be true.
On one thing, the department and the auditor agree. The department said it “agrees there is a need for a new jail.” Its director, Thomas Faust, said “there is no question that the structure of the CDF facility presents real limitations” in delivering services. Auditor Kathy Patterson went further: “We desperately need a new D.C. jail and have (been) for probably 20 years or more.”
Where the new jail stands
The city’s construction page shows the first new building finishing in 2030, with the project listed as in “pre-design.” Bowser’s fiscal 2027 budget proposed $75 million for a new jail built through a public-private partnership. The ACLU of D.C., a civil liberties group, told the Council that the $75 million wouldn’t be available until fiscal 2032. A new jail could cost more than $1 billion, WTOP reported.
The response so far
The Washington Sun reported that the mayor’s office did not immediately respond to its requests for comment and that the attorney general’s office declined to comment. Patterson said “the crumbling facility contributes to every issue reported” and that the most constructive thing the federal government can do is partner with the District, meaning the city.
Here’s the process worth watching. The Justice Department says settlement agreements have led to reforms elsewhere. Whether that happens here is an open question.
The Oct. 19 letter opened an investigation, not a lawsuit. If one comes, federal law requires 49 days’ written notice first.
Leave a comment